The households of the victims killed at Sandy Hook Elementary College in 2012 need to seize the social media accounts of Alex Jones, together with his 2.3 million follower X account, in response to a report from Reuters Thursday. And their argument makes loads of sense while you hear it.
The households gained a $1.5 billion defamation lawsuit in opposition to Jones after he defamed them by repeatedly falsely claiming the Sandy Hook bloodbath, which killed 20 youngsters and 6 grownup employees on the college, was really a staged operation and nobody really died. The lies informed by Jones led to the fixed harassment of the household by his utterly demented followers.
That lawsuit compelled each Jones and his firm InfoWars to file for Chapter 11 chapter virtually two years in the past. However after Jones and the victims’ households failed to barter a payout smaller than $1.5 billion, the conspiracy theorist just lately filed for permission to liquidate his assets in a Chapter 7 chapter, one thing that’s anticipated to be accepted in courtroom on Friday.
However that brings us to the small print of the proposed liquidation, that are at the moment being contested in courtroom filings in response to Reuters, and the query of what must be bought and seized.
From Reuters:
The Sandy Hook households requested the choose to clarify that the Jones’ “@RealAlexJones” account on X.com, previously generally known as Twitter, will probably be among the many belongings turned over to a court-appointed trustee answerable for liquidating Jones’ belongings. Jones’ X account, which has 2.3 million followers, is “no completely different than a buyer listing of every other liquidating enterprise,” the Sandy Hook households argued.
The households additionally declare Jones has been attempting to divert gross sales from his InfoWars retailer to his father’s web site, DrJonesNaturals.com, by selling it on social media.
However an legal professional for Jones, Vickie Driver, reportedly objects to handing over the social media accounts, claiming, “The Connecticut Plaintiffs have by no means wished cash from Jones however to silence him.” And whereas the households are the one ones who can actually reply that query, it doesn’t look like that might be an altogether unreasonable purpose, given the whole lot they’ve gone via.
In spite of everything, that is the man who repeatedly defamed them and made their lives an absolute hell as they have been coping with the grief of shedding family members, together with 20 young children. If the argument is that they didn’t sue a millionaire for egocentric monetary causes, however as a substitute to make sure he can’t proceed to lie and hurt folks, that looks like a totally cheap purpose.
Trending Merchandise
